Question:   Hello! I like the answers that you provide to the questions on your site. Nevertheless, what you write on other pages causes me to doubt. Firstly, you write as if you know everything and you know what to do. Secondly, it seems as if God himself has advised you and practically instructed you to turn the world around. Don't you think that you behave similarly to the entire army of other failed "saviors" of the human race? Why should we believe you and not someone else? What is your specific and radical difference from all others? Name at least one reason why we should join you and share with you your views? Perhaps, this letter will seem to you as not very polite, but nowadays there are so many people on the Internet offering the same assistance and knowledge, causing one to wonders whether it is just another money scam or an attempt to gain fame and followers in their "projects", proclaiming ultimate truth. You don't have to answer. However, there are much more terrifying letters here that you have manage to actually respond to. Somewhere deep in my heart, I believe that you will answer to this one as well.

                                                                      DR, Chicago, USA

Answer:   Hello, DR! The answers to your questions will be given in the order they appear in your letter.

Firstly, it would be strange to get down to business and not to know how to do it. Therefore, if you have an impression of confidence in what the author does, then it cannot be regarded as a weakness or a defect, but only as a virtue.

Secondly, no truth can exist outside of and apart from God. He is its true inspirer and bearer. This is true not only regarding the material which you encounter on this website, but also regarding any other discovery, revelation, or initiative that is useful and beneficial for mankind.

Now we will address the issue regarding the similar (in your opinion) attempts of others who undertook the role, and failed, to bring salvation to mankind. By themselves, these failed attempts cannot be the reason why they should not be undertaken in the future. Therefore, this fact is not only disregarded by the author of this website, but provides a good reason to try to implement this attempt, contrary to all the previously failed ones.

Next. This website does not propose to believe in God, or to believe in anything at all. This constitutes its radical difference from similar projects. This website reveals and gives a person the knowledge about God who, to the individual, was previously unknown and inaccessible, by making God understandable and a close and long-awaited friend. The laws of the world created by Him will no longer be concealed from the individual, and are revealed in abundance to everyone coming to this website for salvation and well-being.

If you read the information under the heading "About Us", then the fact that the website is not interested in missionary work, recognition, and is not created in order to draw into its ranks all random visitors, should not escape your attention. On the contrary,it was created exclusively and only for those for whom it was originally intended. Anyone for whom the content of this website is not obvious will simply have to admit that they do not belong to this group, and therefore can safely continue to follow their own path.

Finally. The knowledge, found on this website,can be acquired by a person only on a voluntary basis. The only manifestation of voluntariness, when purchasing anything, is represented by the very fact of a purchase or of a payment of purchase. The opposite is also true. If one is not interested, nothing will make one buy or pay. Payment, or its absence in the given circumstances, serves a useful purpose of identifying choice or no choice, which will ultimately determine whether a person is to join the people of God, or to remain among mortals. Biblical tradition regards God's chosen people as the redeemed or those who redeemed their right to know. After all, certain kind of knowledge, according to the same tradition, made man mortal.

Allow me to resume answering your entirely fair questions. A deeper understanding of the essence of the topics you mention you can obviously find in the closed part of this website. However, this in no way obligates you to do this. Freedom is enjoyed by all.

Sincerely,  The Comforter.

 Question: Hello, Comforter!

How do you find or look for your "other half"? I understand that nothing is accidental in life, especially the sudden appearance of your soulmate before your eyes; it’s all causal and logical. On the other hand, do you have to sit by the window and wait for his appearance?! A woman wants to be pleasing to the eye and to attract a men's attention! Needless to say, it's not only her wishful thinking, but it’s also vitally important for her wellbeing and self-esteem! Understandably, there are a variety of "dating sites", cafes, and dating clubs, for example, JDate. We are all so different on the outside as well as on the inside, and to find a person who is right for you is like winning a lottery or finding a needle in the haystack. The question becomes, is it worth spending time on correspondence and meetings? In most cases, it's just a waste of time, and in the worst case scenario it's a waste of energy, shattered hopes, even traumatic experiences. It's a good thing if he happens to be a decent person, but what if he’s not?! We understand that we are not perfect ourselves... So the question is, how should we feel about this kind of correspondence?

When I mentioned the lottery example, it was not an entirely accurate comparison. After all, the lottery is a game of chance, and we relate to it as such. Your life doesn't depend on the money lost. Besides the money spent, nothing else changes in your life. However, you can't say the same thing when it comes to relationships between two people, even if they are short-term, because they leave a lasting impression. Who needs this unpleasant experience, and is it necessary at all?! Perhaps, it is true that our encounters and our experiences dealing with other people, be they positive or negative, and also our attitude and the ability to shield ourselves from external influences, all should be perceived as given from the heavens above, and as an integral part of our spiritual development.

Anna, Toronto, Canada

Answer: Hello, Anna! Let's start with the fact that the world's order is such that there is no need for a woman to be engaged in a search for her "other half". This is not a woman's task. Moreover, this search does not bring her closer to the goal mentioned above. On the contrary, the paradox of this is that it distances her from this goal.

As soon as a woman initiates even the slightest signs of "movement" towards the search for her other half, she rapidly begins to lose something very important and vital from her feminine nature. This is so important that the whole navigation mechanism that exists between two human souls – between the two "halves" – that makes contact between them possible, begins to fail. The more a woman is active in her search for her other half, the less a man, her choice, is able to discriminate her presence between other waves of frequencies.

In this situation, when a woman is burdened with a task that is uncharacteristic of her nature, not only does the meeting between the man and the woman destined for each other become questionable, but the search itself is accompanied by a number of erroneous and, therefore, short-lived and short-term connections.

So when you ask about finding your other half, the answer is none other than this urgent advice: do not take any action with regards to this matter because only this "motionlessness" will emit the "loudest" signal for your heart's choice of a man who is moving towards you.

With regards to all sorts of dating websites, they themselves do not carry any malice or purposelessness. Every woman is free to present herself on such a website. It is very important to provide information about your preferences and to make sure you strictly adhere to your preferences. It is this adherence to your established boundaries in your assessment of a potential partner that will save you from unnecessary contacts and correspondences. A woman simply needs to have the courage to reject the empty pastimes that she will have with people who do not meet her standards. The problem is that women are ready to make contact with any man who communicates with them, assuming in this case that it is possible to "adjust" to everything, while it is the man who should be doing the "adjusting" under these circumstances. If a woman deprives a man of this natural inherent characteristic that he possesses, then she will have to face all the bitter experiences that you mentioned in your letter.

In order to prevent an unpleasant experience, and circumstances that damage the female soul, we need to know and accept the rules of the game called life, which is nothing more than an expression of gender relations themselves in their entirety and versatility.

You should also not forget that it is this violation of the order of relationships that led the perfect human world to its physical and spiritual collapse. It is very difficult to believe in this, but human mortality is the result of such violation, not to mention the broken hearts and failed human fates intended to taste the sweetness of such relations.

Your task is to take a proper and rightful place in the resolution of such a vital issue in your life as the attainment of your spiritual half. However, the spirit is not captured by means of the flesh nor is the net for it made of flesh. Therefore, all your efforts should be directed to the understanding of the spiritual communication tools with the spirit of your person of choice. "I'll teach you to be catchers of men's souls", Christ said, representing this spiritual work primarily as a science. Every woman on earth will have to accomplish this, and this website is dedicated to give women all the assistance possible in this task.

Sincerely, 

The Comforter

Question: Hello, Comforter! I have read all your answers to the questions that were posed to you, which I found reasonable and useful but, nevertheless, my soul cannot find rest. Allow me to explain why. I can accept and I recognize a man’s responsibility for all the suffering that he endures if man does a wrong, even if he does not know what is right, but nevertheless suffers affliction from his wrongdoing. It is clear that the very outcome of his mindlessness is his punishment, not to mention the punishment for more serious and intentional misconduct. It is also clear that this is not God who prosecutes him. The law is his prosecutor, as in the example given in your previous answers with the fool that is sloppy in dealing with electricity. But why is God indifferent to his suffering?

Even a man attempts to save another man in need who finds himself on the edge. Rarely does somebody's torment (especially physical) leave another indifferent, if one is psychologically healthy. People panic from the inability to somehow ease the suffering of others who, at times, find themselves in very terrible situations or die in awful agony.

Please understand me correctly: if God is all-powerful and merciful, does He not see human suffering, and can he not relieve it? Or, at the very least, can you provide an explanation as to why or for what reason people suffer in such a way, so that people have the opportunity to avoid such terrible retributions for their ignorance of the law?

His absence next to a suffering man is not clear to me, and completely inexplicable in terms of mercy, when the man is most likely to need it. I am not in any way attempting to remove responsibility from a person for his fate, but I am surprised by the indifference of God. This is what bothers me. After all, God is intelligent, and I would like to receive a reasonable explanation for what is, in my opinion, His incomprehensible indifference to the man at the moment of his greatest suffering.

Honestly, I myself have tried to find the answers to this question for a long time and, unfortunately, I have not succeeded. Yet, judging by what I already had a chance to read here, I still cherish a faint hope to receive them. I would be grateful for your response. I wish you every bit of luck in such a laborious affair as the reconciliation of man with God. It appears that God needs justification in human eyes no less than, as it is commonly believed, man does in His.

Alexey Sh., Pskov region, Russia

Answer: Hello, Alexey! Let's start with this: what do you know about God? Not so little, it seems – He is intelligent. But if He is intelligent, He cannot be cruel. You are absolutely right to intuitively correlate the best in man with perfection in God. So, His absence at the time of man's greatest suffering cannot be justified by His "heartlessness".

But if the absence of God at the time of a man's suffering is not dictated by a "malevolent intent" of God, then a man, at the very least, should understand that there is something else besides the desire or intent of God to help the sufferer with His personal intervention. It is exactly this "something else" that is the proper answer to your question. I hope you understand that nothing can restrict God except for His own restrictions that He chooses to impose on Himself. In this case, He has restricted Himself by giving a man freedom of choice, elevating it into a law, and sanctifying the human right to be oneself. God allowed a man to have a will that is different from His own, depriving Himself of the right to intervene in human choice. Since that time, this restriction practically regulates God's position beside a man.

Since man is created in the image and likeness of God, the same set of constraints is present in a person's life. He should, in the same manner as God, make every effort to restrict himself from the right to intervene in choices that people make around him. The degree of familial relationships or other closeness in relationships, such as friends and neighbours, as well as the way you perceive their conduct as being right or wrong, does not only make it non-permissible to intervene, but also poses a rather serious temptation to implement this interference. As is for God, a man's intention of non-interference is also voluntary. Therefore, the choice is called free.

However, freedom of choice, without personal responsibility for these choices, simply does not exist in nature. The one who makes decisions is the one who is held responsible for them. Suffering is an inevitable companion of the freedom of choice if the choice is wrong. This always occurs when the main condition of freedom is violated. The main condition is non-interference in another's choice, or its sanctity. The opposite is also true – satisfaction accompanies the right choice.

We needed this little excursion into the fundamental order of things in order to understand the origin of pain. Any suffering is always the result of interference with the choice of another, either through judgement or by force. Now your question, based on what has been said above, begins to sound differently: why is God absent when one begins to "pay the bills", so to speak? Why does He not come to the rescue to cancel a consequence of a man's wrong choice in order to relieve him from his suffering?

God forbade himself from intervening in human "settlements" with life, but this arrangement does not take away from Him the very possibility of doing so. After all, the one who creates laws has the ability to cancel them as well.

In suffering, a man begs for the abolition of the verdict (of the law) over him and, for the sake of his salvation, God is faced with the problem of abolishing the law for the sufferer. What law, you ask? The sanctity of human choice. That is, God is faced with the dilemma of suspending the painful consequence of the person's wrongdoing, or cancelling the very existence of the law itself.

This would be similar to abolishing the law of gravity for the sake of saving the lives of passengers on a crashing airplane. You can now imagine the seriousness of this process if we reduce it to approximate the human understanding of the role of God in the salvation of men. That is, in order to save a person from the law, God would have to take him out of the jurisdiction of the law or, in other words, to deprive a person of his freedom of choice. Note that all this is necessary in order to save a person from suffering. Being deprived of the freedom to choose as he pleases or to be whom he is, he ceases to be responsible before the law and, therefore, he rids himself of punishment which, in this case, is his suffering.

Once a person loses his right to be himself, he gets rid of prosecutions by law. It is not only the rule, but also the mechanism itself, which is actively engaged in a strictly organized system of the development of our world. Therefore, when one asks about the whereabouts of God during those times when it hurts so much, it is possible to say, without exaggeration that, in this moment, God is "concerned" with only one task – of creating an altar of sacrifice for the suffering person. This alter of sacrifice is the creation of circumstances in one’s life that will allow this person to exercise his humble behaviour in order to redeem himself from suffering.

Any conflict, any war that a man initiates in order to defend his right to freedom, which he lost (because he sinned), is completely irrelevant and opens the gate to martyrdom.

To defend freedom under these circumstances is like to stand against the abolition of the law of gravity intended to help the rapidly falling plane with live people on board. In the end, when the natural course of things is suspended, then people's deaths will be suspended as well. To insist on adherence to the lawful order of things will result in the inevitable collapse of the plane, as torture will inevitably catch up and take captive the unspoken truth-seeker.

It is exactly with this purpose that God sends the entire human nation into slavery, where submissive service to other's will, with the detriment of his own will, fully redeems him from prosecution and returns him the lost freedom. Later on, in the interpretation of the Revelation of John, personally applied aspects of this service will be revealed, with real meaning which, to this date, is comprehensible only to very few people.

When you write about the knowledge that is denied to man to obtain his salvation, it is hard to disagree with this statement. The objective of this website is precisely to fill this gap. The problematic side of this task is not in the inaccessibility of knowledge, but in the difficulty of its implementation. The idea that ​​mortification redeems one from suffering is extremely difficult for human perception which is created free but, unfortunately, which is not always reasonable.

God created the world so perfect and individually adaptable to each person as an instrument for his salvation. God created the world so perfect that knowledge is required only for understanding this simple fact, and that no other knowledge for one’s salvation is required. The world possesses all the opportunities for a person to accept them and to use them. The question of familiarity with this kind of knowledge is valid only to an extent that this knowledge provides one with an understanding and awareness of this otherwise incomprehensible fact of its perfection to the human mind.

All of us should remember that God always takes part in the salvation of man. His role, in this case, is not the role of a sorcerer with a magic wand, or a footman standing in service of the whims of man, because God is a genius of the perfect solution. By overlooking this fact, a person subsequently misinterprets God's essence. This fact brings him even more suffering, but it does not lessen the dignity of God. It is crucial to know God at least in order to put an end to your own torment, which is the result of an ignorant war that you have with the world. This is no longer a question to God, but to the man himself: where are you, man, and where is your own compassion for yourself?

Sincerely, 

The Comforter

Question: Modern morality and most religions forbid adultery. We are accustomed to this state of social norms. My question is about the intimate connections of an unmarried woman. Is sex before marriage permissible? My second question is this: are intimate relationships approved for divorced women? 
Let me put the question more specifically. What consequences follow sex outside of marriage?

                                                  Veronica, Montreal, Canada

Answer: Hello, Veronica! Extramarital relationships are relationships without commitment because marriage is a contract of a man's obligation to a woman with whom he is intimate. If you are willing to carry the full measure of responsibility for such relationships alone, without any claim from the second party that should have shared it with you, then consider yourself spared of the consequences of non-marital relationships. Unfortunately, this "spinelessness" in life is not found at all. Be prepared for prolonged and chronic resentment, broken heartedness and emotional emptiness. No woman, who surrendered herself cheaply and thoughtlessly into the hands of men who love free handouts, escaped this fate.

It would be fair to ask God the following question: what should a woman do, and how does she arrange and handle the existing sexual side of her nature, when the safety and welfare of this arrangement requires certain order and conditions for its implementation? After all, it's much easier to conduct a free way of life, as mentioned above, without any formalities, but it is these formalities that insist on the strict protocol of divine world order.

First of all, it is necessary to accept these conditions. Which means not only coming into intimate relations under warranty from the man, but also rejecting any kind of relations of this sort in general, if these guarantees are absent. This is much more important and more efficient, because this fact immediately changes the atmosphere of events around a woman. Her rightful intention leads to the appearance of the right (from a legal point of view) and reliable man by her side.

The "holy place is never empty". Traditionally, as they say, no one comes close to a holy place without bearing gifts. If a woman surrenders "without the gifts", then she is brought outside of the Temple and loses her holy status. What does this mean? It means that all obligations of God to her are exhausted, and all the promises of a full, decent and happy life are taken away. It is not because God is angry but because reality is reasonably organized and in it there is no place for chaos or uncertainty, despite the fact that all of us are given the right to disagree with it and not to include this consideration in our relationships with people and the world.

Suppose you get familiarized with the instructions of the proper handling of electricity. You can take it or not, but the consequence of not taking it are in no way canceled. Yes, you will be subjected to the unpleasant effect of electricity if you ignore the rules of its handling.

As you might have guessed, in this situation, there is no one who would judge you or punish you. Everything is somehow arranged by itself without the involvement of any second or third party, particularly, God himself. You get "punished" by electricity itself and by your unwillingness to reckon with reality.

The reality for a woman is that she has an absolute value and nobody (including the woman herself) is allowed to waste this value for free, because there is a hidden blessing in her, the one that mankind has failed to retrieve back since the fall of man. Loss of immortality with all its benefits - this is the result of this loss. And this is the price of "intimacy" outside of marriage.

It is possible to become angry with this kind of conclusion: not everybody lives outside the bonds of marriage but the mill of mortality is hanging over them too. Yes, it's true and it means only one thing: the mystery of marriage is equally inaccessible to all.

To find out what marriage really is, what the rules of its conclusion are, and its meaning and secret purpose, read the Book online. Practically, the upcoming transformation of ideas about marriage represents the very essence of approaching upheavals and global changes in the fate of earthly humanity.

                                                      Sincerely, Comforter.

Question: Hello. I apologize for the lack of an exclamation mark. Even in writing I wish to speak more quietly because our family, or rather, our relatives' family is in mourning. A woman with a child was killed in a terror attack. I don't know how to console myself. I cannot explain the meaning of what happened. I don't understand the reasons for this massacre. Yet, these are not the last victims who will never know anything about this. We are denied to know the reason for their deaths. Even if one knows, then how can others find out? What is the reason for their deaths? I ask you without any hope for a reasonable explanation.

Julia, Haifa, Israel

Answer: Hello, Julia. You're right, let's refrain from exclamation marks because the cause is quite serious and very sad.

To think that a person somehow "earned" such a massacre means to believe that there stands above him a heartless and evil judge; a very strange judge too, who is punishing the innocent and is ignoring the crimes of real criminals.

Therefore, if the idea of a punishing judge had at least some real basis, it is unlikely that we would observe, in this case, such a strange picture in its injustice and selective attitude towards people who committed crimes. Moreover, it is such an absurd picture too, where it is not the criminals who get punished, but their victims that become "cannon fodder" for the villains.

Based on the above, let's leave the very idea that a person subjected to a terror attack somehow "earned" or found himself punished in such an inhumane way in a world ruled by God. If we, as intelligent and civilized people, are not able to kill our own children, even for the most serious crimes committed by them, then God, in whose image, likeness and children we all are, by definition, cannot be involved in such a terrible massacre.

So if it is not God's doing, then is there someone else who massacres men, you might ask?

Then let me ask you a question: are children or adults, having the freedom and the right to do as they please and committing wrong deeds, judged and punished by their parents? Or, on the contrary, does the whole measure of responsibility and consequences of human actions lie with the person himself? The answer here is absolutely clear: God is not a man's judge. He is, like every parent, the creator and protector of his creation.

Therefore, by rejecting any possible attempts to lay the blame on some evil forces, presumably existing separately from the human, we get the chance to see clearly and to have an idea that is free of any distortion of what had happened.

The entire fault lies on a tragic abnormality or rupture of time structures, the breakdown of which, according to the biblical revelation, started in the Garden of Eden under notorious circumstances which occurred between spouses, Adam and Eve.

This incorrectness has led to the rupture of time passages of human destinies. It is as if the well-established system of air corridors, existing in aeronautical communications, malfunctioned in such a way that the previously strictly fixed time and space coordinates of each aircraft were arbitrarily changed to unreliable "flight" time. Thus, there was a violation of the order which later led to a collision in time and space between two objects moving toward each other, similar to the crossing of paths of a terrorist and his victim. Their trajectories coincided and it was not God who joined them together. The reason for these matches and mismatches is uniquely connected to a man himself, because man creates similarity with everything he faces.

When, and under what circumstances, the victim creates similarity with a terrorist (and this similarity, as it is known, leads to the merging of connected elements, and connection in time is no exception), is the subject of close scrutiny and detailed consideration in The Book for All Times posted on this website. In relation to the issues discussed here, the website takes a more educational stance than anything else. Therefore, it is not possible to give a comprehensive answer to your question within the limits of a short answer in this correspondence because of its especially serious nature.

All you need to gain from this response is an understanding that all human tragedies, including mortality, are the consequence of a specific system error, which man's mind tightly possesses. The power and reign of this error is such that a person does not even search for it in the right place, but its very essence is idolized by him. Moreover, humanity is ready to defend its treacherous idol with the utmost passion and loyalty, and the idol reimburses its servants generously for their loyalty by sending them directly to hell.

You are asking the right questions but it does not mean that hearing the correct answer will be as simple as posing these questions. Therefore, know that there are answers to all your questions. If you have the courage to hear them, go to the site and begin your return to God, with whom your parting began with the worship of the idol of lies, promising man the "golden mountains" but, in reality, depriving it of all. May God bless you on this path.

Sincerely, 

The Comforter

Question:  Hello, Deeply Respected Comforter! I came across your website by accident. That is, of course, it is NO accident. I searched the Internet for anything that could help me to get out of the routine, the quagmire of my existence. Fortunately, there were no tragic upheavals in my life and there are none, but somehow I feel SO sad. Vanity, drudgery and ... "no one can help."

I will not describe my emotional past pains, except to say that I am 47 years old, my family and I emigrated from the Soviet Union more than 20 years ago, lived in Israel and now are settling down in Canada. When I listened to "First Aid" on your site, I found that many, very many things have become clearer. Life has become simpler, easier, clearer, and calmer. I want to send you a heartfelt thank you. If I understood correctly, the family, our inner circle, is the space where we build our existence. That is, our personal emotional state (ideally - peace and quiet) and material well-being too, does not necessarily depend on our behavior, but depends on our verbal communication with this very family. If I'm right (Your confirmation is very important to me, since I'm trying to "reconfigure" myself and would like to see this process going in the right direction), please explain to me how I should communicate (and is it really necessary?) with my sister and her family who remained in Israel. We are not at odds, we have no complaints and grievances towards each other, but we do not communicate. Thank you in advance for your reply and my apologies for the muddled summary of my thoughts.

                                               Alina, Kitchener, Canada

Answer:   Hello, Alina! Actually, your question is as follows: do I have a right to my feelings, or should I ignore them based on an idea that is entirely clear to me? In this case, the idea looks like a duty to keep in touch with relatives who have no direct relationship to your family.

The family is none other than the husband, wife and their minor children. As you can see, family does not include any other adults, including parents of spouses or adult children, single or with family, or brothers and sisters of spouses or their parents. All these people are relatives. What is the fundamental difference between the status of a relative and a family member?

The answer to this question we find by defining what a family is. Family is always and only a couple of adults, a man and a woman in marriage, and their minor children, if any. Marriage is an alliance or a contract between a man and a woman, which provide for various kinds of rights and obligations, again, between husband and wife. These kinds of agreements and alliances between relatives do not exist – consanguinity cannot be canceled. It exists and nothing can affect the fact of its existence. Marriage, on the other hand, may be entered into and terminated. It is not regulated by blood relationships, but by completely different mechanisms. The most important thing in this statement is the fact that these mechanisms are in direct opposition with the nature of blood relationships.

For example, a man and a woman become separated from the families of their parents when they marry and form their own family unit. Accordingly, the legitimate authority of their parents over them terminates and the power of marital obligations becomes established. By prioritizing in favour of parents or other relatives over marital obligations, they are at risk of breaking the marriage contract, which is considered a severe action equal to desecration or destruction of the Temple. Therefore, the biblical recommendation to "leave your father and mother and stick to your wife" or "leave the house of your father" is so resolute and is so important that it is among the earliest and the first biblical revelations to man.

For these reasons, you can now compose the right answer to your own question. If communication with a relative doesn't cause any damage to your family's relationships, such as: does not take the time and energy away from educating and raising your minor children; let’s you keep the house in suitable condition for family life; does not take the time away from communicating with your own spouse; and doesn't conflict with your feelings and sympathy towards this particular family member (which is very important as it damages your emotional and psychological health and, subsequently, that of the members of your family), then there are no direct prohibitions against such communication. The law does not regulate these relations, as opposed to marriage, and you have no obligations to maintain them. Therefore, all the benefits that you mentioned do not directly depend on this communication. They are completely related to the way your relationship will be formed inside your family, that is, first of all, with your spouse. It is important to define these priorities and, from all that has been said above, they are quite obvious for a reasonable person.

                                                 Sincerely, Comforter

Question: Hello, Comforter! Today, when I decided to leave this life, there was something that stopped me. There was no longer anything worth living for. All that was possible to take away from me was taken. I am without legs, without an arm, without a face. They feed me with a spoon, transport me in a wheelchair as firewood. I can see the light of day with only one eye. It's all over. There is only torment that's left. Why do I need it? Who is this good for? Me or some strange God who needs my torment? There are no answers to these questions, but people try to invent them in order to go on living, or to keep people like me in their totally irrelevant lives. So, I stayed in it, because I stumbled upon this site and decided to give this one last chance. My question to God is this: with what purpose can I fill the remaining days of my life so that my desire to live would override my desire to die?

                                                                              Arkady, Haifa, Israel

Answer: Hello, Arkady! Since you have already chosen and admit for yourself the possibility of a voluntary departure from this life, then regard that the search for the question of the meaning of life in your own life is really exhausted. Even if you have taken at least one last attempt to find it, then one look at your own body would quickly return you to the original state of its absolute absence – the lack of meaning of life for yourself, for your body and its needs.

However, life beyond these requirements also exists. And it is called dedication or service. As a rule, people voluntarily go for such service, but your case is special. You have been chosen and called up for service. Unwillingly.

Your problem is that you are trying to find the meaning of life for what you already do not own - legs, arms, and eyes. Yes, feet should walk, hands should work, eyes should look. Yes, all of this is true.

But God, since you mentioned Him, wished to bring your attention to your soul. After all, the soul is like a body that has its own meaning of existence. Your soul has not been taken away from you. It has its own meaning. It should be identified and given its meaning in order to give meaning to what is still left for you.

The main purpose of the soul is in love. If a person does not love, then he loses his soul. Why you need it in the absence of a full physical body, you will learn in due time, when you will get another healthy body in the new world, part of which you might become, or might not. It all depends on what you choose. In the new world, the laws, which for you here are not obvious, have a perfect degree of expressiveness. If your soul is not love, then there will be no opportunity to integrate you into this world. So, consider what happened to you to be a great gift and help in introducing a new life.

If you still have at least a shred of pity, not to yourselves, but to the people close to you, have mercy on them and give them the opportunity to quietly perform their duties to care for you without remorse and horror. Let them carry out their part of the heavy burden – they need it. After all, they need their lessons of love too, and you make these lessons possible for them.

Finally, about the mystery of your service: someone close to you is at risk of losing her soul, and so you have become a friend and accomplice of God in the salvation of that soul. If you leave, then all the possibilities of redemption (correction) of the soul will be taken away from her. Please take note of a person on whom lies the greatest physical and mental weight of being next to you. Remember, the Savior descended into hell: "For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to assist them that are tempted", (Heb., 2:18). You are definitely in hell, but you are a Savior, and your anguish is with meaning. And not forever.

                                                                     Sincerely, the Comforter

Question: Hello, Comforter! How do I rid myself of the hell in which I find myself day after day? The fact of the matter is that a person very close to me is terminally ill. It is unbearable to sit back and wait for the end. What do I do? Where is God for me to beg His mercy for this man who has been sentenced to die? Why has He left us to the mercy of fate? Even if we do something wrong, why is He silent? Why does He not give us even the slightest chance to fix at least something? If He is merciful, as we are preached everywhere, then is this not cruel? I cannot find peace in my soul from such injustice and, because of this, it is even harder emotionally. Please help me and provide me with support in order to give comfort to my friend and to not lose faith in the fact that this world is ruled by a reasonable and kind God.

                                                           Vera S., St. Petersburg, Russia

Answer: Hello, Vera! This website has all the answers to your questions. Go to the "First Aid" section of this website, where you will receive clear instructions of where to start so God may come close to you and help you. Without these details that establish your relationships with God, all your calls to Him will remain unanswered, at best.

There exists a worst case scenario about which God, not hiding the fact and the truth about Himself, speaks in the Torah (Bible): it is impossible to see Him and live. You're asking Him to reveal Himself and to show you the way to salvation but you do not realize that not everything that He presents to you as the way out from your existing situation can be unequivocally interpreted and implemented by you. If this is the case, it's best if you do not ask Him for salvation: everyone who has called and pleaded to God, but had not implemented His instructions in His response, pays for it with their own life, as evident from the words of the Torah.

There exist other words, however, such as "My people see me, and do not die". Therefore, all of us have a chance to survive and to save our loved ones, but only as His people – people who know God and accept Him. People who can understand and accept the relevance of such things as the critical state of health, such as the state of your friend, which undoubtedly contributed not only to your appeal towards this site, but also as an opportunity for you to join a new human community that will always go before the face of God, and will not have a lack of communication with Him.

                                                            Sincerely, Comforter.

Question: Hello! In your responses, you are talking about Israel and the Jews. Are these the only people on earth who need help? Why does the Jewish topic over-saturate your website while you claim to help all those in need? I am a Russian man, and I do not understand why you, firstly, give preference to women and, secondly, to the Jews.

                                                                           M.K, Riga, Latvia

Answer: Hello, M.K! To provide a brief answer, I will write the following: it is precisely for "the lost sheep of the House of Israel" that such an act of universal magnitude as the arrival of the Savior is predetermined. It is NOT for you and me to change this intention of the Creator with respect to humanity. This is His world, and He will decide for Himself what He wills, and what He does not. So that we were not mistaken in this regard, the Book was left for us as a will from which we derive the knowledge of His intentions. This is the briefest explanation of the matter at hand.

The survival of the rest loses its meaning if the above mentioned "sheep" do not survive, because their destruction will determine the fate of the whole world and not in the best possible way. God is not interested in a world where there is no place left for Him.

Anticipating your next question with regards to the semantic parallels between the "House of Israel" and "God", we openly declare to you that this is not a coincidence or an oversight, and you don’t have to be ashamed of your speculation because you're correct, both mean the same thing. Thus, there always will be someone to take care of all the rest, only if the House of Israel itself is rescued.

I apologize if the answer seems to you a little abrupt. It's just that the time for being ceremonious has passed, and for this kind of misconception there is no time left at all. Remember that the truth is rarely pleasant, but it is always useful, because it places a person into reality. And what is reality? The answer to this question is beyond the scope of answers to these letters.

                                                             Sincerely, Comforter

Question: We live in Israel. Every day we have missiles flying over our heads. Is this our fault? Why is it that there starts an outbreak of completely terrible events in this world, as if by someone's order? Who needs this massive loss of life? Is there any salvation for those who find themselves in "hot spots"? If there are answers to all these questions, then I will believe in God.

                                             Alina, Rishon LeZion, Israel

Answer: Hello, Alina! Indeed, the current situation in Israel is very difficult, but the same is true for those people who, like you, experience all the hardships of "terrible events", only in other "hot spots" of the globe. The sharp increase in the number of accidents per "square kilometer" of our planet is a special sign for its inhabitants. Do not look for spiritualism or for special mysterious considerations in this phrase, which always accompany this kind of answer. Time is to blame for such a concentration (which will only speed up) of catastrophic events that you now witness around you, the format of which is undergoing major changes. To make it clearer – the time of the causal flow of events is undergoing a sharp decrease. What does this mean? The distance in time between an act and its consequence, which existed previously, no longer exists. Practically, the resource of human ignorance is exhausted. Now, a person is required to have an understanding and comprehension of all the actions that he takes and which, in one form or another, represent the cause of what happens to him. There is only one "fault" in a man, as you called it - he does not know and does not want to know God. I hope you understand that the knowledge of God is something more than a mere acquaintance with Him. This, above all, is an understanding of how the world works. It's impossible to successfully control and drive a car without knowing the rules of driving. God insists that we know the rules. Any disaster is really a sign that the "driver" cannot cope with the task of control. This website, and the information it contains, is intended to correct circumstances like these. What is time, why does it undergo a sharp decrease, what accompanies this decrease, and why is this reduction needed at all? – this is the short list of questions for which you will get answers if you turn to the material on this website and make an effort to study it. Remember, God most certainly is not interested in the loss of people's lives, He is interested in their education.

                                            Sincerely, Comforter

Question: Hello, Comforter! The war between Israel and the Palestinians drags on. More and more Israeli soldiers are killed on a daily basis. It is scary to imagine how much longer this may take and how many more losses our country will endure. Is this all really going to end as it always does – with withdrawal from the territories followed by a new round of violence? What should be done by the Jews in order to forget the wars against them as if it was all just a nightmare that they have been dreaming during the entire history of their existence?

                                                                  Mila, Ashkelon, Israel

Answer: Good afternoon, Mila! I hope you understand that the Jews can be entitled to Israel only as Jews. It's possible and necessary to look for the cause of the constant oppression of Israel by nations surrounding it only in this context. There is something that puts Israel and Israelis on par with their enemies, which in itself opens the door to these enemies and allows them to penetrate into the camp of Israel. If you have already started reading the Book on the site, then this statement will be understandable for you. If not, then you should become aware of the fact that in order to establish any kind of connection it requires similarity of connected elements. If this similarity did not exist, then there would now be an impassable chasm between Israel and its enemies but, unfortunately, it seems that this is not the case. In reality, your question sounds and requires more in-depth consideration and response. In essence, it boils down to a completely different question: what does it means to be a Jew? Judging by the fact that Israel sustains losses, and the enemy attacks are not always answered back with fire, this question remains unanswered. It is not worth transferring an answer to the question regarding Jewish identity to the traditional observance of the Jewish way of life. If this was the correct response to the question, then for the salvation of Israel it would be enough to have only one such Jew, just as God promised to Abraham to save Sodom and Gomorrah with the presence of at least one such righteous individual there. There is a difference between the Jews and all other nations of the earth, and it is not in the traditional side of things. This difference is so hard to comprehend, that only Jewish souls can withstand it. With reference to the questions of the purpose of Jewish souls, and what mission they accomplish for the sake of the stability and security of this world, is a completely different topic. You may suggest it for discussion on the website in the conference format.

                                                                   Sincerely, Comforter